Your message no longer matches the business
Services, positioning or proof have changed, but the website still describes an older version of the company.
For Cape Town businesses whose current website has become outdated, difficult to use, hard to find or weak at generating enquiries. We start by deciding what should be protected, what should change and whether a focused redesign or broader rebuild is the safer route.
Redesign warning signs
A redesign should solve identifiable business and usability problems. A new colour palette alone is not a strategy.
Services, positioning or proof have changed, but the website still describes an older version of the company.
Navigation, forms, spacing or calls to action feel cramped, unclear or inconsistent on smaller screens.
Important services are buried, headings are vague, internal links are weak or pages compete for the same search intent.
Large media, old plugins, unnecessary scripts or a heavy theme make the experience slower than it needs to be.
Visitors can browse, but proof, pricing context, forms and calls to action do not guide them toward a practical next step.
Outdated visuals, inconsistent information, missing proof or broken journeys make the business look less established than it is.
First step: diagnosis
The current website contains history, URLs, content and sometimes search visibility worth protecting. The redesign review is meant to separate useful assets from inherited problems before a new scope is agreed.
Request the redesign reviewRedesign or rebuild?
The correct answer depends on the current technical foundation and the scale of change required. These are decision signals, not automatic rules.
The current platform is stable and maintainable
Most URLs and content structure still make sense
The main problems are visual hierarchy, messaging or usability
Required functionality already works reliably
The current platform limits performance or maintainability
Navigation and page architecture need substantial restructuring
SEO migration requires cleaner URLs, redirects or content consolidation
New functionality changes the way the website needs to operate
Pricing expectations
We do not invent a separate low-cost “reskin” price that ignores migration and technical risk. The likely starting package is selected from the same approved website framework, then the redesign scope is adjusted for what must be retained, migrated, redirected or rebuilt.
Content migration, extra pages, complex integrations, specialist functionality, copywriting and significant SEO migration work may change the final scope. A final quotation is confirmed after review.
Small businesses needing a professional website without advanced functionality.
View inclusionsCompanies that want their website to attract enquiries, publish content and support growth.
View inclusionsBusinesses that need an ecommerce website with product presentation and payment flow.
View inclusionsBusinesses that need a distinctive flagship website rather than a standard company website.
View inclusionsRedesign process
We inspect what is working, what is creating friction and what should be protected before design decisions are made.
We agree which content, URLs, integrations and functionality stay, change or disappear, including redirect requirements where relevant.
Page hierarchy, content priorities, mobile behaviour, proof and calls to action are redesigned around the current business and customer journey.
The redesigned site is implemented and checked for links, forms, responsive behaviour, SEO foundations, accessibility and performance-sensitive issues.
The launch plan protects important URLs and redirects where possible, then the live site is checked again after publication.
Relevant project proof
These examples demonstrate structure, proof, search foundations and conversion thinking. They are not presented as artificial before-and-after redesign screenshots.
Shows how a complex offer can be reorganised around clear journeys, quotation paths, local search structure and proof.
View project proofShows how a broad service catalogue can be structured around course discovery, enquiry journeys and search-focused content architecture.
View project proofShows the underlying approach to service architecture, package journeys, SEO structure and verified quote-system handoffs.
View project proofFrequently asked questions
The decision depends on the condition of the current platform, page architecture, URLs, content, performance and required functionality. A redesign review should identify what can be retained safely and what would create unnecessary compromise if kept.
There is no separate cosmetic-redesign price list. Social Fundi scopes redesign work against the same website package framework used for new builds, then adjusts for confirmed requirements such as content migration, redirects, extra pages, integrations and specialist functionality.
No redesign can guarantee unchanged rankings. Risk can be reduced by auditing existing URLs and search visibility, preserving valuable content where appropriate, mapping redirects carefully and avoiding unnecessary structural changes.
Potentially, yes. The first step is to review the current platform, access, content and functionality. Depending on those findings, the safer route may be an in-platform redesign or a controlled rebuild and migration.
Useful content can be retained, but it should be reviewed before migration. Some pages may need rewriting, consolidation or clearer positioning so the redesigned site does not simply carry old structural problems into a new visual shell.
Practical SEO foundations are considered during the redesign, including crawlable structure, metadata, headings, internal links, canonical handling and redirects where relevant. Ongoing SEO campaigns, content production and specialist search work are scoped separately unless included in the agreed package.